Davis v. Williams et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 25

ORDERED that: 1) The 24 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Dfts' 16 & 22 motions to dismiss are GRANTED to the extent Dfts seek dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at th e Lowndes County Detention Facility prior to initiating this cause of action; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 USC § 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Lowndes County Detention Facility; 4) No costs are taxed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/8/2015. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JACK A. DAVIS, # 182448, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN ROGERS, and DR. KERN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:15-CV-215-WKW [WO] ORDER On September 15, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 24.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. # 16 & 22) are GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Lowndes County Detention Facility prior to initiating this cause of action; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy available to him at the Lowndes County Detention Facility. 4. No costs are taxed. A separate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 8th day of October, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?