Young v. Forniss et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 11

ORDERED as follows: (1) The 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Plf's action challenging his 2/3/2015 disciplinary proceedings is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) because it is not properly before the court at this time; and (3) This action is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/29/2015. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KAREEM YOUNG,
# 222 970,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN FORNISS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-298-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On September 3, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 10.) Upon an independent
review of the file and the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)

The Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2)

Plaintiff’s action challenging his February 3, 2015 disciplinary

proceedings is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
because it is not properly before the court at this time; and
(3)

This action is DISMISSED prior to service of process.

A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 29th day of September, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE