Carter v. J.A. Logistics, Inc. (MAG+)
ORDER ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; further ORDERING as follows: (1) this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the FRCP and the court's inherent authority to enforce its orders, for Pl f's failure to comply with orders of the court; (2) plf's 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot; and (3) plf's 30 motion for rescheduling is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/29/16. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
J.A. LOGISTICS, INC.,
) CASE NO. 2:15-CV-299-WKW
On April 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 31.) Upon an independent review of the
file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 31) is ADOPTED. It is further
ORDERED as follows:
This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court’s inherent authority to enforce its
orders, for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders of the court;
Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. # 26) is DENIED
as moot; and
Plaintiff’s motion for rescheduling (Doc. # 30) is DENIED as moot.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 29th day of April, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?