Carter v. J.A. Logistics, Inc. (MAG+)

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; further ORDERING as follows: (1) this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the FRCP and the court's inherent authority to enforce its orders, for Pl f's failure to comply with orders of the court; (2) plf's 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED as moot; and (3) plf's 30 motion for rescheduling is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/29/16. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMIE CARTER, Plaintiff, v. J.A. LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:15-CV-299-WKW ) ) ) ) ORDER On April 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 31.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 31) is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED as follows: 1. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court’s inherent authority to enforce its orders, for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders of the court; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. # 26) is DENIED as moot; and 3. Plaintiff’s motion for rescheduling (Doc. # 30) is DENIED as moot. A separate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 29th day of April, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?