Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 122

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The 120 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The ADOC dfts' 40 , 41 , 62 , 64 , 71 , 83 , 84 , 86 , 95 , 114 , & 116 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3) The medical dfts' ; 37 motion to dismiss is DENIED; 4) The medical dfts' 55 , 61 , 107 , & 113 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 5) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the dfts; 6) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 7) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/20/2018. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION EDWARD PHILPOT HICKMAN, AIS #285076, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. KARLA JONES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-352-ECM ORDER On July 18, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #120) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The ADOC defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. The medical defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED. 4. The medical defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 5. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 6. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 7. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Done this 20th day of August, 2018. /s/Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?