Banks v. Pivnichny, et al. (MAG+)
ORDERED that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The plf's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/22/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-369-WKW
On June 2, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 4) in
this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review
of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
DONE this 22nd day of June, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?