Traywick v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) Plf's 87 & 90 objections are overruled; (2) The 86 recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted to the extent discussed above; (3) The 78 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/18/2016. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
KENNETH S. TRAYWICK,
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
OPINION AND ORDER
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for
from denying him prompt and adequate medical care for
caused by correctional officers assaulting him.
case is before the court on the recommendation of the
Upon an independent and de novo review
recommendation adopted on the ground that plaintiff has
not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of his
The court does not adopt the portion of the
request for relief is moot.
* * *
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff’s objections (doc. nos. 87 & 90) are
Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 86) is adopted to the extent
(3) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no.
78) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further
DONE, this the 18th day of August, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?