Abercrombie v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
8
ORDERED that the 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Willie Abercrombie's claims against Defendants State of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that Defendants Stat e of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED as parties, and that this action against the remaining Defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/13/2015. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIE ABERCROMBIE,
# 258 008,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-408-WKW
ORDER
On June 16, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation, to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5.) Upon an independent review of the file
and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Willie Abercrombie’s claims against
Defendants State of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED with prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that Defendants State of Alabama and the
ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED as parties, and that this action against the remaining
Defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.
DONE this 13th day of July, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?