Abercrombie v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 8

ORDERED that the 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Willie Abercrombie's claims against Defendants State of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that Defendants Stat e of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED as parties, and that this action against the remaining Defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/13/2015. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE ABERCROMBIE, # 258 008, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-408-WKW ORDER On June 16, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5.) Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff Willie Abercrombie’s claims against Defendants State of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), that Defendants State of Alabama and the ADOC Riot Team be DISMISSED as parties, and that this action against the remaining Defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. DONE this 13th day of July, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?