Thomas v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 25

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 24 objection to the recommendation is overruled; 2) The 22 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) The 3 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/31/2015. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL K. THOMAS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DR. RAHMING, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv470-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United plaintiff’s denied. States motion Also Magistrate for before preliminary the court objection to the recommendation. is Judge that injunction the the be plaintiff’s Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The objection (doc. no. 24) the United to the recommendation is overruled. 2. The recommendation of Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 22) is adopted. States 3. The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 3) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 31st day of August, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?