Thomas v. Rahming et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 25

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 24 objection to the recommendation is overruled; 2) The 22 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) The 3 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/31/2015. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL K. THOMAS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
DR. RAHMING, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv470-MHT
(WO)

OPINION AND ORDER
This case is before the court on the recommendation
of

the

United

plaintiff’s
denied.

States

motion

Also

Magistrate

for

before

preliminary

the

court

objection to the recommendation.

is

Judge

that

injunction
the

the
be

plaintiff’s

Upon an independent

and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.

The

objection

(doc.

no.

24)

the

United

to

the

recommendation is overruled.
2.

The

recommendation

of

Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 22) is adopted.

States

3.

The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no.

3) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred
back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.
DONE, this the 31st day of August, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE