West Alabama Women's Center et al v. Miller

Filing 20

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs West Alabama Women's Center and William J. Parker, M.D.'s 3 motion for a temporary restraining order is granted. (2) Defendant State Health Officer Donald E. Williams on, M.D., and all those acting in concert with him, are TEMPORARILY ENJOINED from: (a) enforcing the requirements of Alabama Administrative Code § 420-5-1-.03(6)(b) against plaintiffs West Alabama Women's Center and William J. Parker, M.D.; and (b) failing to notify immediately all state officials responsible for enforcing the requirements of Alabama Administrative Code § 420-5-1-.03(6)(b) about the existence and requirements of this temporary restraining order. (3) This injunction shall expire on August 18, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The court will issue its formal opinion explaining this decision within three days. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/4/2015. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION WEST ALABAMA WOMEN’S ) CENTER and WILLIAM J. ) PARKER, M.D., on behalf of ) themselves and their ) patients, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DONALD E. WILLIAMSON, ) M.D., in his official ) capacity as State Health ) Officer, ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv497-MHT (WO) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER This lawsuit is an as-applied challenge by a licensed abortion clinic in the State of Alabama and its new, that, in sole order doctor to against perform a regulation abortions at requiring the clinic, either the doctor must have admitting privileges at a local hospital covering or physician the who clinic has must such contract privileges. with a The plaintiffs, West Alabama Women’s Center and Dr. William J. Parker, on behalf of themselves and their patients, claim that this regulation is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to them because it violates their patients’ right to liberty and privacy and their right to pursue their business and profession. The defendant is Dr. Donald E. Williamson, in his official capacity as the State Health Officer. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (civil rights). The matter is now before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. Upon consideration of the motion, responsive briefing, and supporting documentation, the court finds that the plaintiffs have met the requirements for issuance of a temporary restraining order: (1) that they have shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their suit; (2) that they will suffer irreparable harm absent injunctive relief; (3) that the harm to the plaintiffs absent an injunction would outweigh the harm 2 to the defendant from an injunction; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. 50 F.3d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1995). Ingram v. Ault, However, because briefing was not completed until July 27, 2015, the court needs additional time to finish preparing its formal opinion with supporting findings of fact. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) William Plaintiffs J. West Parker, Alabama M.D.’s Women’s motion for Center a and temporary restraining order (doc. no. 3) is granted. (2) Defendant State Health Officer Donald E. Williamson, M.D., and all those acting in concert with him, are TEMPORARILY ENJOINED from: (a) enforcing Administrative Code the § requirements of 420-5-1-.03(6)(b) Alabama against plaintiffs West Alabama Women’s Center and William J. Parker, M.D.; and (b) failing to notify immediately all state officials responsible for enforcing the requirements of Alabama Administrative Code § 420-5-1-.03(6)(b) about 3 the existence and requirements of this temporary restraining order. (3) This injunction shall expire on August 18, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The court will issue its formal opinion explaining this decision within three days. DONE, this the 4th day of August, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?