Gafford v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 7

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 5 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 4 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/18/2015. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID SCOTT GAFFORD,
# 203620,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER J. DUNN, et
al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-524-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On July 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation to which
Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 4, 5.) The court has conducted an
independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to
which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff’s objections fail to
undermine

the

well-established

principles

recited

and

applied

in

the

Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 5) is OVERRULED.

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 4) is ADOPTED.

3.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process

in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 18th day of August, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2