Gafford v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 5 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 4 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/18/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
DAVID SCOTT GAFFORD,
COMMISSIONER J. DUNN, et
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-524-WKW
On July 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation to which
Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 4, 5.) The court has conducted an
independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to
which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff’s objections fail to
Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 5) is OVERRULED.
The Recommendation (Doc. # 4) is ADOPTED.
This action is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process
in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 18th day of August, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?