Jacoby v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 44

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 42 Recommendation is adopted. (2) Defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in fav or of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/19/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BRENT JACOBY, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JONES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv543-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 42) is adopted. (2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 31) is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 19th day of September, 2018. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?