Boone v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
Filing
49
ORDER finding that Boone has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. In addition, the Court is of the opinion that Boone's appeal has no legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith; DENYING 46 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 12/9/2021. Furnished to Appeals clerk. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAUOD BOONE, AIS # 276751,
Petitioner,
v.
CHERYL PRICE, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACT. NO.2:15-cv-556-ECM
(WO)
ORDER
Now pending before the Court is Petitioner Daoud Boone’s pro se motion for a
certificate of appealability (doc. 46). The motion is due to be denied.
To mandate the issuance of a certificate of appealability, a petitioner must make a
“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see
also Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983). Further, “[a]n appeal may not be taken
in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In making this determination as to good faith, the Court must use an
objective standard, such as whether the appeal is “frivolous,” Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962), or “has no substantive merit,” United States v. Bottoson, 644
F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 1981) (per curiam).
Applying these standards, the Court finds that Boone has not made a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right. In addition, the Court is of the opinion that
Boone’s appeal has no legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in
good faith. See Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Boone’s motion for a certificate of appealability (doc. 46) is
DENIED.
Done this 9th day of December, 2021.
/s/ Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?