Jackson v. Young et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 10

ORDERED that 1. The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Thomas Young is DISMISSED as frivolous prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendant Thomas Young is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. This case, with respect to the allegations against Defendants Fair, Daniels, and Burt, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/28/2015. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SHANNON JACKSON, #265337, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. INMATE THOMAS YOUNG, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-567-WKW ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. # 5) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that 1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 5) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Thomas Young is DISMISSED as frivolous prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendant Thomas Young is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. This case, with respect to the allegations against Defendants Fair, Daniels, and Burt, is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. DONE this 28th day of August, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?