Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 202

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 96 ) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc. no. 100 ) are denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judgefor further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/20/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MAURICE BULLOCK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WARDEN STRICKLAND, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv638-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a motion to compel injunctive relief challenging the sufficiency of his access to the law library and legal materials. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that these motions be denied. There are no objections to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 96) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc. no. 100) are denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 20th day of December, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?