Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
202
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200 ) is adopted. (2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 96 ) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc. no. 100 ) are denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judgefor further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/20/2016. (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MAURICE BULLOCK,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN STRICKLAND,
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv638-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for
preliminary
injunction
and
a
motion
to
compel
injunctive relief challenging the sufficiency of his
access to the law library and legal materials.
This
case is before the court on the recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge that these motions be
denied.
There are no objections to the recommendation.
Upon an independent and de novo review of the record,
the court concludes that the recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The
recommendation
of
the
United
States
Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 200) is adopted.
(2) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no.
96) and the motion to compel injunctive relief (doc.
no. 100) are denied.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge
for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 20th day of December, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?