Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER denying 62 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/2/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WARDEN JONES, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Upon consideration of the plaintiff’s motion for a
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
In so deciding, the court notes that the plaintiff
requests the same relief in his motion for temporary
preliminary injunction (doc. no. 49), which is pending
before the United States Magistrate Judge.
complex nature of the plaintiff’s claim and the work
the magistrate judge has already put into handling the
motion, it will be most efficient for the magistrate
judge to address the plaintiff’s request for relief in
the first instance.
Further, as the court lacks the
specialized knowledge required to make decisions about
the plaintiff’s medical treatment, it would not be in
present a serious risk of being harmful to him) for the
court to grant his request for a temporary restraining
order at this time.
DONE, this the 2nd day of November, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?