Pickett v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
5
ORDERED as follows: (1) Plf's 4 objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 3 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (3) Plf's 2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; (4) This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to pay filing and administrative fees upon his initiation of this case. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/9/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOE RANGER PICKETT,
# 128361,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT BENTLEY, Governor,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-693-WKW
[WO]
ORDER
On September 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation
(Doc. # 3) to which Plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. # 4).
Based upon an
independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to
which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED as follows:
(1)
Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 4) is OVERRULED;
(2)
The Recommendation (Doc. # 3) is ADOPTED;
(3)
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is
DENIED.
(4)
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
pay filing and administrative fees upon his initiation of this case.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 9th day of October, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?