Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 59

OORDER directing as follows: (1) plf's two "appeal[s] to the objection" (doc nos 42 and 46 ) are construed together as a motion to reconsider the court's 28 opinion and 29 judgment, and said motion is denied; (2) plf's 40 motion for reconsideration is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/15/16. (djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WENDY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. DAVID GAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv705-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
After an independent and de novo view of the record
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s two “appeal[s] to the objection”
(doc. nos. 42 & 46) are construed together as a motion
to reconsider the court's opinion and judgment (doc.
nos. 28 & 29), and said motion is denied.
(2)

Plaintiff’s

motion

for

reconsideration

no. 40) is denied.
DONE, this the 15th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

(doc.