Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)
OORDER directing as follows: (1) plf's two "appeal[s] to the objection" (doc nos 42 and 46 ) are construed together as a motion to reconsider the court's 28 opinion and 29 judgment, and said motion is denied; (2) plf's 40 motion for reconsideration is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/15/16. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DR. DAVID GAMS, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
After an independent and de novo view of the record
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s two “appeal[s] to the objection”
(doc. nos. 42 & 46) are construed together as a motion
to reconsider the court's opinion and judgment (doc.
nos. 28 & 29), and said motion is denied.
no. 40) is denied.
DONE, this the 15th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?