Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 59

OORDER directing as follows: (1) plf's two "appeal[s] to the objection" (doc nos 42 and 46 ) are construed together as a motion to reconsider the court's 28 opinion and 29 judgment, and said motion is denied; (2) plf's 40 motion for reconsideration is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/15/16. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION WENDY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. DR. DAVID GAMS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv705-MHT (WO) ORDER After an independent and de novo view of the record it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s two “appeal[s] to the objection” (doc. nos. 42 & 46) are construed together as a motion to reconsider the court's opinion and judgment (doc. nos. 28 & 29), and said motion is denied. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration no. 40) is denied. DONE, this the 15th day of July, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE (doc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?