Williams v. Womble et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 70

ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The U.S. Magistrate Judge's 69 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) Dfts' 22 , 27 , & 40 motions for summary judgment be and are hereby GRANTED; 3) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs are taxed against Plf for which execution may issue; A separate Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/6/2019. (alm, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
RONALD VINCENT WILLIAMS,
#239426,
A/K/A RONNIE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH WOMBLE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:15-cv-728-ECM
)
)
)
)
ORDER

On April 5, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case
to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 69). After an independent
review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (doc. 69) be and
is hereby ADOPTED.
2. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docs. 22, 27, 40) be and are
hereby GRANTED.
3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue.

A separate Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 6th day of May, 2019.

/s/ Emily C. Marks
EMILY C. MARKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE