Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al

Filing 72

OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) That the 71 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) That the dft's 57 motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL POSEY, Plaintiff, v. HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv787-ECM OPINION On August 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 71). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Done this 17th day of September, 2018. /s/Emily C. Marks UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?