Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al

Filing 72

OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) That the 71 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) That the dft's 57 motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/17/2018. (alm, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DANIEL POSEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
HYUNDAI MOTOR
MANUFACTURING ALABAMA
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv787-ECM

OPINION
On August 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 71). Upon an independent review
of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1.

That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby
ADOPTED;

2.

That the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby
GRANTED;

3.

That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

4.

Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff.

A separate final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Done this 17th day of September, 2018.
/s/Emily C. Marks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE