Oliver v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 10 Objections are OVERRULED; 2) The 9 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) Plf's 2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; 4) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon initiation of this case. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/24/2016. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
MICHAEL DARNELL OLIVER,
T. JONES, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-920-WKW
On January 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case. (Doc. # 9.) Plaintiff filed Objections on February 11, 2016. (Doc. # 10.)
The court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the
Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects and has independently reviewed the
file. As set forth in the Recommendation, this action is barred by operation of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g). Nothing in Plaintiff’s Objections demonstrates that he currently
“is under imminent danger of serious physical injury” such that he may circumvent
the procedural bar set forth in § 1915(g).
Upon careful consideration, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s Objections are OVERRULED;
The Recommendation (Doc. # 9) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
pay the filing and administrative fees upon initiation of this case.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 24th day of February, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?