Chillous v. Colvin (CONSENT)
Filing
16
FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Commissioner and agains t the Plaintiff Arthur Chillous and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/31/17. Also mailed to SSA Chief Judge and SSA Office of Hearings and Appeals.(djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ARTHUR CHILLOUS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
NANCY A BERRYHILL,1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security )
)
Defendant.
)
CASE NO.2:16-cv-0001-TFM
[wo]
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is
AFFIRMED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Commissioner and against
the Plaintiff Arthur Chillous and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as
a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE this 31st day of March, 2017.
/s/ Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule
25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for
Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs
to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?