McClenton v. RCC Jackson Hospital et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 5

ORDER that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs Complaint challenging events which occurred in 2012 are DISMISSED with prejudice under the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915( e)(2)(B)(i) as Plaintiff failed to file the Complaint regarding these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period oflimitation. 2. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/1/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOE S. MCCLENTON, #240 601, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. RCC JACKSON HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:16-cv-074-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), entered on February 8, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint challenging events which occurred in 2012 are DISMISSED with prejudice under the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as Plaintiff failed to file the Complaint regarding these allegations within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation. 2. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 1st day of March, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?