Williams v. Maiben et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
52
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 48 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 44 Recommendation is adopted. (3) Plaintiffs claims against defendants Bridg ett Tyner and Kevin Genous are dismissed without prejudice to plaintiffs right to file a separate civil action against these individuals, and defendants Tyner and Genous are terminated as parties to this action. (4) No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter thisdocument on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/19/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
RONNIE WILLIAMS/RONALD
VINCENT WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRIDGETT TYNER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv110-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's
objections
(doc.
no.
48)
are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 44) is adopted.
(3) Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Bridgett
Tyner and Kevin Genous are dismissed without prejudice
to plaintiff’s right to file a separate civil action
against
these
individuals,
and
defendants
Tyner
and
Genous are terminated as parties to this action.
(4) No costs are taxed.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed, and is referred back to
the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 19th day of May, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?