Williams v. Maiben et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 52

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 48 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 44 Recommendation is adopted. (3) Plaintiffs claims against defendants Bridg ett Tyner and Kevin Genous are dismissed without prejudice to plaintiffs right to file a separate civil action against these individuals, and defendants Tyner and Genous are terminated as parties to this action. (4) No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter thisdocument on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/19/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RONNIE WILLIAMS/RONALD VINCENT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGETT TYNER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv110-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 48) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 44) is adopted. (3) Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Bridgett Tyner and Kevin Genous are dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to file a separate civil action against these individuals, and defendants Tyner and Genous are terminated as parties to this action. (4) No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 19th day of May, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?