Casey v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
ORDER: it is ORDERED that (1) The 20 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED; and (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/10/2018. (alm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NATHAN S. CASEY, JR., # 097085,
LEON FORNISS, et al.,
) Civil Action No. 2:16cv114-WHA
On December 14, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 20)
to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record
and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that
(1) The Recommendation (Doc. # 20) is ADOPTED;
(2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1)
is DENIED; and
(3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 10th day of January, 2018.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?