Chappell v. Texas Steakhouse of Alabama, Inc. et al
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that: (1) The 34 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted. (2) The 31 Joint Motion to Substitute is granted, and Colony Insurance Company is substituted for Colony Specialty Insurance Company as the defen dant in this action. (3) All claims against Colony Specialty Insurance Company are dismissed without prejudice and with no costs taxed, and Colony Specialty Insurance Company is terminated as a party to this action. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/28/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
KERRY CHAPPELL, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
COLONY SPECIALTY INSURANCE )
COMPANY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv140-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the court is the recommendation of
the
United
motion
to
States
Magistrate
substitute
Colony
Judge
that
Insurance
the
Company
joint
for
defendant Colony Specialty Insurance Company be granted
and that all claims against Colony Specialty Insurance
Company be dismissed.
recommendation.
Upon
There are no objections to the
and
independent
and
de
novo
review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
(1)
The
recommendation
(doc. no. 34) is adopted.
of
the
magistrate
judge
(2) The joint motion to substitute (doc. no. 31) is
granted, and Colony Insurance Company is substituted
for Colony Specialty Insurance Company as the defendant
in this action.
(3) All claims against Colony Specialty Insurance
Company
are
dismissed
without
prejudice
and
with
no
costs taxed, and Colony Specialty Insurance Company is
terminated as a party to this action.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge
for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?