Burnette v. Jones (INMATE 1)

Filing 32

ORDERED as follows: 1. The 27 objection is OVERRULED. 2. The 23 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED with the exception of changing Easterling to Ventress, and the motions for preliminary injunction are DENIED. 3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/20/2016. (kh, ) .

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM RANDALL BURNETTE,
AIS #135390,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KARLA JONES,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO 2:16-cv-146-WHA

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #23),
and the Plaintiff’s Objection thereto (Doc. #27). Following an independent evaluation and de
novo review of the file, the court finds the objection to be without merit.
Initially, the Plaintiff objects to the statement in the Recommendation that he is housed in
the infirmary at Easterling, when in fact he is housed in the infirmary at Ventress. This is merely
a typographical error and in no way affects the findings set forth in the Recommendation that the
Plaintiff failed to establish each of the elements necessary for issuance of a preliminary
injunction. The remainder of the objection likewise fails to establish his entitlement to
preliminary injunctive relief. The court agrees with the conclusion of the Magistrate Judge, and
it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The objection is OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED with the exception of
changing Easterling to Ventress, and the motions for preliminary injunction are DENIED.
3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE this 20th day of April, 2016.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE