Robinson v. Alabama State University (MAG2)
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant's objections (doc. no. 28 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 26 ) is adopted. (3) Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22 ) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on /19/2017. (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SHARON ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv148-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, plaintiff filed this lawsuit
contending
that
harassment
and
work.
she
other
has
been
forms
of
subjected
sex
to
sexual
discrimination
at
This lawsuit is now before the court on the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
that defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s case be
denied.
Also
before
the
court
objections to the recommendation.
are
defendant’s
After an independent
and de novo review of the record, the court concludes
that defendant’s objections should be overruled and the
magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.
***
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Defendant's
objections
(doc.
no.
28)
are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 26) is adopted.
(3) Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22) is
denied.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge
for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?