Robinson v. Alabama State University (MAG2)

Filing 29

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant's objections (doc. no. 28 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 26 ) is adopted. (3) Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22 ) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on /19/2017. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION SHARON ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv148-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, plaintiff filed this lawsuit contending that harassment and work. she other has been forms of subjected sex to sexual discrimination at This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s case be denied. Also before the court objections to the recommendation. are defendant’s After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that defendant’s objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted. *** Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant's objections (doc. no. 28) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 26) is adopted. (3) Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?