White v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the Plaintiff to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b )(1)(A) as ordered by this court. 2. The Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED as such motion is not properly before the court absent payment of the initial partial filing fee. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/6/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES EDWARD WHITE, #209419, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO 2:16-cv-308-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), entered on June 13, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the Plaintiff to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by this court. 2. The Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED as such motion is not properly before the court absent payment of the initial partial filing fee. DONE this 6th day of July, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?