Clark v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 23

ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 ) is ADOPTED; 2. The claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e) 2)(B)(i); and 3. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/12/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR CLARK, JR., #232 178, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. * * * * * ARTHUR CLARK, JR., #232 178, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-319-WHA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-320-WHA * ORDER On September 21, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED; 2. The claims against the State of Alabama are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and 3. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this 12th day of October 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?