Crane v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Filing
18
ORDER GRANTING 17 MOTION for clarification and More Definite Statement to the following extent, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/24/17. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM THOMAS CRANE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv399-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
Upon
consideration
of
petitioner’s
motion
for
clarification and “more definite statement” (doc. no.
17), it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the
following extent.
Document number 5 is the document,
submitted by petitioner, titled “Defense Objection to
Order
of
document,
the
Court.”
submitted
by
Document
number
petitioner,
7
titled
is
the
“Defense
Objection to Order of the Court and Request for Review
by Chief District Judge.”
The court overruled these
objections because the United States Magistrate Judge
has
committed
no
fraudulent
action
or
other
legal
error; instead, the magistrate judge has handled this
case according to well-established law.
Furthermore,
petitioner has no right to have this case reviewed by
the Chief United States District Judge.
DONE, this the 24th day of January, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?