Crane v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 17 MOTION for clarification and More Definite Statement to the following extent, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/24/17. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM THOMAS CRANE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv399-MHT (WO) ORDER Upon consideration of petitioner’s motion for clarification and “more definite statement” (doc. no. 17), it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the following extent. Document number 5 is the document, submitted by petitioner, titled “Defense Objection to Order of document, the Court.” submitted by Document number petitioner, 7 titled is the “Defense Objection to Order of the Court and Request for Review by Chief District Judge.” The court overruled these objections because the United States Magistrate Judge has committed no fraudulent action or other legal error; instead, the magistrate judge has handled this case according to well-established law. Furthermore, petitioner has no right to have this case reviewed by the Chief United States District Judge. DONE, this the 24th day of January, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?