Clark v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 77

ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 76 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1) Defs' 48 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3) Costs are taxed against Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/19/2019. (cnw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANIEL BARTHOLOMEW CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LEEPOSEY DANIELS, WARDEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-403-WHA ORDER On July 25, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 76. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 48) is GRANTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done, this 19th day of August 2019. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?