Stevens v. Buckner et al
Filing
40
ORDER: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 30 ) is adopted. (2) Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 11 ) is granted to the extent that Counts I and II of the complaint are dismissed as moot. All other claims remain pending. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed, and is referred back to United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/25/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MEREDITH GARRARD STEVENS,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY BUCKNER, in her
personal and individual
capacity and in her
official capacity as
Commissioner of the
Alabama Department of
Human Resources; et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv456-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 30) is adopted.
(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc.
granted
to
complaint
the
are
remain pending.
extent
that
dismissed
as
Counts
moot.
I
and
All
no. 11) is
II
other
of
the
claims
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed, and is referred back to
United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 25th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?