Sykes v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Filing
13
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner Payton Lee Sykes's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted. (2) The sentence (doc. no. 51) entered in United States v. Sykes, 2:05cr18-01-MHT (M.D . Ala. January 26, 2006), is vacated. (3) The clerk of court is to file this judgment, along with the companion opinion, in United States v. Sykes, 2:05cr18-01-MHT (M.D. Ala.). (4) Petitioner Sykes is to remain in the custody of the Attorney General pending resentencing. It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/15/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
PAYTON LEE SYKES,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv473-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Petitioner Payton Lee Sykes’s petition for writ
of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is granted.
(2) The sentence (doc. no. 51) entered in United
States
v.
Sykes,
2:05cr18-01-MHT
(M.D.
Ala.
January 26, 2006), is vacated.
(3) The clerk of court is to file this judgment,
along
with
the
companion
opinion,
in
United
States v. Sykes, 2:05cr18-01-MHT (M.D. Ala.).
(4) Petitioner Sykes is to remain in the custody of
the Attorney General pending resentencing.
It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 15th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?