Moultry v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Filing
8
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/11/2016. (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ADRIAN MOULTRY,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv481-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
Pursuant
to
28
U.S.C.
§ 2255,
petitioner
Adrian
Moultry, a federal prisoner, filed this lawsuit seeking
habeas relief.
Specifically, he seeks to vacate, set
aside, or correct the sentence this court imposed upon
him pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) of the Armed
Career Criminal Act (ACCA).
He relies on the Supreme
Court's decisions in Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S.
___, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), that the residual clause
of § 924(e) is unconstitutionally vague, and Welch v.
United States, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1257 (2016),
that the Johnson decision is retroactive on collateral
review.
Moultry was convicted of one count of possession
with
intent
controlled
to
distribute,
substance
in
or
distribution
violation
of
21
of,
a
U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B), one count of possession of a
firearm in relation to drug trafficking in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), and one count of being a
felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18
U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(1).
He
was
then
sentenced
to
192
months’ imprisonment pursuant to § 924(e)(1) based on
prior convictions for third-degree burglary.
The
parties
agree
that
Johnson
relief under Johnson and Welch.
is
entitled
to
See Joint Proposal for
Proceeding On § 2255 Motion (doc. no. 4).
Accordingly,
the
court
will
grant
his
petition,
vacate his sentence, and resentence him.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 11th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?