Walker v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
22
ORDERED that: 1. The 20 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1 ) and Motion for Emergency Injunction (Doc. # 7 ) are DENIED; and 3. This civil action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/16/2016. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JUSTIN WALKER,
AIS #266108,
Plaintiff,
v.
KARLA JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
) CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-528-WKW
)
)
)
)
ORDER
On August 2, 2016, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc.
#20) addressing Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency Injunction. (Doc. #7). Plaintiff’s
motion for Emergency Injunction seeks relief identical to that sought in the Motion
for Preliminary Injunction. (Doc. # 1). As the Magistrate Judge stated in the
Recommendation, Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is moot.
No timely
objections to the Recommendation have been filed.
After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 20) is
ADOPTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1) and Motion for
Emergency Injunction (Doc. # 7) are DENIED; and
3.
This civil action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings.
DONE this 16th day of September, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?