Bales v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDERED as follows: 1) The 8 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as barred by the statute of limitations; and 3) To the extent Plf's claims are not time-barred, his claims against Dft Corizon Medical Services are DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/28/2017. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID HUGH BALES, #178239,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORIZON MEDICAL
SERVICES, INC., and JEAN
DARBOUZE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-714-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 8.)
There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review
of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8) is

ADOPTED;
2.

Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as barred by the statute of limitations; and
3.

To the extent Plaintiff’s claims are not time-barred, his claims against

Defendant Corizon Medical Services are DISMISSED without prejudice under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 28th day of February, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2