Wells v. Peterson et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 16

ORDER that: 1. The Magistrate Judge's 15 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's 11 Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED; and 3. To the extent the 11 Petition for Writ of Mandamus may be construed as a Motion for Production of documents, it is also DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/23/2017. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION NICHOLAS WELLS, # 207770, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH PETERSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-780-WKW [WO] ORDER On December 15, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 15) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. # 11) is DENIED; and 3. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. # 11) may be construed as a Motion for Production of documents, it is also DENIED. DONE this 23rd day of January, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?