Clegg v. Siddiq (INMATE 2)
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) Plf's 19 & 20 motions to dismiss are GRANTED; and 2) Plf's claims against Dfts Siddiq and Duffell as described herein are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JEFFREY S. CLEGG, #276 457,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
DOCTOR TAHIR SIDDIQ,
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-782-TFM
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-930-TFM
*
JEFFREY SCOTT CLEGG, #276457,
Plaintiff,
v.
JESSICA DUFFELL,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the court are Plaintiff’s motions to dismiss some of his claims against the named
defendants. See Docs. 19, 20. In the motions, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss his claim that Defendant
Siddiq prescribed neomycin so it would not heal and cure the infection in Plaintiff’s eye. Plaintiff
also seeks to dismiss his claim against Defendant Duffell that she did not provide him with enough
baby shampoo (per volume) with which to wash and clean his eyes. Id. Upon consideration of
Plaintiff’s motions, it is ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motions to dismiss (Docs. 19, 20) are GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Siddiq and Duffell as described herein are
DISMISSED without prejudice.
Page 1 of 2
DONE this 21st day of February 2017.
/s/Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?