Spangler v. Duffell et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 26

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 24 ) is adopted. (2) Defendants motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22 ) is granted on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/19/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MARCUS MONTEZ SPANGLER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
MS. DUFFELL,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv793-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (doc. no. 24) is adopted.
(2) Defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 22) is
granted

on

the

basis

of

failure

to

exhaust

administrative remedies.
(3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

of

docket
the

as

a

Federal

final
Rules

judgment
of

Civil

Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE