Braswell v. Glovis America, Inc. (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)

Filing 21

ORDERED as follows: 1) The 20 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Dft's 12 motion to partially dismiss is DENIED; 3) Dft's 12 motion to stay is GRANTED; 4) Plf is ORDERED to notify the court within five days of his r eceipt of a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. In the notice, Plf should explain whether he intends to amend his complaint in light of the right-to-sue letter. If Plf does not receive a right-to-sue letter, he should notify the court how he wishes to proceed; and 5) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case until further notification is received from Plf. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/24/2017. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES BRASWELL, Plaintiff, v. GLOVIS AMERICA, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-822-WKW ORDER Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 20.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 20) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s motion to partially dismiss (Doc. # 12) is DENIED; 3. Defendant’s motion to stay (Doc. # 12) is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to notify the court within five days of his receipt of a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. In the notice, Plaintiff should explain whether he intends to amend his complaint in light of the right-to-sue letter. If Plaintiff does not receive a right-to-sue letter, he should notify the court how he wishes to proceed; and 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case until further notification is received from Plaintiff. DONE this 24th day of March, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?