Steiger v. Capel et al (INMATE 3)
ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's 6 Objections are OVERRULED and the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). 3. A separate judgment will enter, after which the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 12/19/2016. (dmn, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER,
Case No. 2:16-cv-895-TJC
WALLACE CAPEL, JR., et al.,
Plaintiff, an inmate of the Alabama penal system, initiated this case by filing a pro se
Complaint (Doc. 1). Upon review of the Complaint, the assigned United States Magistrate
Judge issued a Recommendation (Doc. 4) recommending that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed
with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff filed Objections (Doc. 6).
After a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s Objections
are without merit and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is
Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 6) are OVERRULED and the Recommendation
(Doc. 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
This case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
A separate judgment will enter, after which the Clerk of Court shall close this
DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida this 19th day of December, 2016.
Honorable Terry F. Moorer
United States Magistrate Judge
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?