Jones v. Wright(MAG+)

Filing 8

ORDER: This case is before the court on the document (Doc. 7 ) filed by the Plaintiff, which the court interprets to be a Motion to Reconsider the 6 Order entered on 2/28/2017, in which the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was adopted and the case was dismissed prior to service of process for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The motion still fails to show any basis for federal court jurisdiction that would allow this court to consider his claims. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/9/2017. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

LEEROY JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
DARBY WRIGHT,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:16CV943-WHA
(wo)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the document (Doc. #7) filed by the Plaintiff, which the
court interprets to be a Motion to Reconsider the Order (Doc. #6) entered on February 28, 2017,
in which the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge was adopted and the case was dismissed
prior to service of process for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The motion still fails to show any basis for federal court jurisdiction that would allow this
court to consider his claims. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider is
DENIED.

DONE this 9th day of March, 2017.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE