Futral v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 12

ORDER that: (1) The 11 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED because it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d); and (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/8/2019. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHNNY SHANNON FUTRAL, # 201076,
Petitioner,
v.
JOHN CROW, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:16cv967-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
On January 18, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 11) to
which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and
upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that
(1) The Recommendation (Doc. # 11) is ADOPTED;
(2) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1)
is DENIED because it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28
U.S.C. § 2244(d); and
(3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 8th day of February, 2019.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE