Reaser v. McCovery (INMATE 2)
ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 8 Objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 7 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) Plf's 1 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED; and 4) The matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/14/2017. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
TERRANCE REASER, #265571,
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-1005-WKW
On January 31, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc.
# 7) to which Plaintiff timely filed objections (Docs. # 8.) The court has conducted
an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to
which objections are made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the Recommendation, the
Magistrate Judge recommended the denial of Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary
injunction (Doc. # 1), reasoning that Plaintiff had failed to show irreparable injury
(Doc. # 7). Similarly, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff’s failure to propose
a remedy made it impossible to determine what burden an injunction would place on
the Alabama Department of Corrections and whether such an injunction would be in
the public interest. (Doc. # 7.) To the extent Plaintiff objects to these findings, his
objection is without merit and is due to be overruled. (Doc. # 8.)
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. # 8) is OVERRULED;
The Recommendation (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 1) is DENIED;
The matter is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for additional
DONE this 14th day of March, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?