Smith v. Corizon Health Services et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 115

you JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Tai Q. Chungs motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 100 -1 & 107 ) are granted. (2) Plaintiff Avery L. Sm iths constitutional claims against defendant Chung are dismissed with prejudice, and defendant Chung is terminated as a party to this action. No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/22/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION AVERY L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv29-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Tai Q. Chung’s motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 100-1 & 107) are granted. (2) Plaintiff claims against Avery defendant L. Smith’s Chung are constitutional dismissed with prejudice, and defendant Chung is terminated as a party to this action. No costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 22nd day of November, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?