Harrison v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 18

ORDER: The 15 order and 16 final judgment, are hereby VACATED; it is ORDERED that 1) Petitioner's 17 objections are OVERRULED; 2) The 14 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) Petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and 4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/14/2019. (alm, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:17cv42-WHA [WO] ORDER The order and final judgment entered on February 19, 2019 (Docs. # 15 & 16), are hereby VACATED. This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 28, 2019 (Doc. # 14). Also before the court are Petitioner’s objections to the Recommendation (Doc. # 17). Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation and objections, it is ORDERED that (1) Petitioner’s objections (Doc. # 17) are OVERRULED; (2) The Recommendation (Doc. # 14) is ADOPTED; (3) Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and (4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 14th day of March, 2019. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?