Ray v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC of Delaware
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 41 objection is overruled; (2) The magistrate judge's 40 recommendation is adopted; (3) The 29 motion to stay is granted; (4) This case is stayed while the case of Hoggard, et al., v. Natio nstar Mortgage LLC of Delaware, d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company, 1:17-cv-99-TK (D.D.C.) is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Dft shall file reports explaining the status of the Hoggard litigation (A) on the first Monday of every third month, beginning in April 2018, and (B), within 14 days of any decision denying class certification, granting dismissal of any claims, or entering judgment on any claims in the Hoggard case, attaching a copy of the releva nt opinions or orders; (6) Plf's request for preservation discovery is referred back to the magistrate judge; This case is administratively closed in this court during the pendency of the stay. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/28/2018. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
HAROLD RAY, on behalf of
himself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE
LLC OF DELAWARE, d/b/a
Champion Mortgage
Company,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:17cv99-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff
class-action
filed
lawsuit
this
asserting
putative
nationwide
claims
breach
of
of
contract, unjust enrichment, and negligence related to
the defendant mortgage company’s home inspections for
its reverse mortgage customers.
Defendant filed a
motion to stay this case while another similar lawsuit
earlier filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia proceeds.
This lawsuit is now
before the court on the recommendation of the United
States
Magistrate
granted.
Judge
before
Also
objections
to
requests
to
the
the
for
defendant
that
motion
court
recommendation,
preservation
be
the
required
to
to
are
and
stay
be
plaintiff’s
his
included
discovery
and
for
provide
notices
to
the
the
court shortly after any critical developments in the
other case.
After an independent and de novo review of
the
the
record,
court
concludes
that
the
magistrate
judge’s recommendation should be adopted.
***
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) The objection (doc. no. 41) is overruled.
(2) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
40) is adopted.
(3) The motion to stay (doc. no. 29) is granted.
(4) This case is stayed while the case of Hoggard,
et
al.,
d/b/a
v. Nationstar
Champion
Mortgage
Mortgage
LLC
Company,
of
Delaware,
1:17-cv-99-TK
(D.D.C.) is pending in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia.
2
(5)
status
Defendant
of
the
shall
Hoggard
file
reports
litigation
explaining
(A)
on
the
the
first
Monday of every third month, beginning in April 2018,
and (B), within 14 days of any decision denying class
certification,
granting
dismissal
of
any
claims,
or
entering judgment on any claims in the Hoggard case,
attaching a copy of the relevant opinions or orders.
(6) Plaintiff’s request for preservation discovery
is referred back to the magistrate judge.
This case is administratively closed in this court
during the pendency of the stay.
DONE, this the 28th day of February, 2018.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?