Mitchell v. Hamilton et al (INMATE 3)
ORDER that: 1. The 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Mitchell's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which the Magistrate Judge construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, is DENIED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/7/2017. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ESTEVERNICO A. MITCHELL,
DARRYL HAMILTON, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-150-WKW
On March 17, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 3.) Upon an independent review of
the record and consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 3) is
Mitchell’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 1), which the
Magistrate Judge construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, is DENIED; and
This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 7th day of April, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?