Mitchell v. Hamilton et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 4

ORDER that: 1. The 3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. Mitchell's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which the Magistrate Judge construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, is DENIED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/7/2017. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ESTEVERNICO A. MITCHELL,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
DARRYL HAMILTON, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-150-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On March 17, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 3.) Upon an independent review of
the record and consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 3) is

ADOPTED;
2.

Mitchell’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 1), which the

Magistrate Judge construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, is DENIED; and
3.

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

A final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 7th day of April, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE