Battle v. Mays (INMATE 2)

Filing 86

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 85 Objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 83 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) The Dfts' 16 & 37 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 7/27/2020. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTONIO DENTRAY BATTLE,
AIS #250 833,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CANDICE TAYLOR, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-cv-228-RAH-JTA

ORDER
Before the Court is the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered
June 22, 2020. (Doc. 83.) The Plaintiff filed an objection on July 2, 2020. (Doc. 85.) Based on an
independent review of the record, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Objection, (Doc. 85), is OVERRULED.
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
3. The Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 16, 37) are GRANTED.
4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE, this 27th day of July, 2020.

/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE