Fuqua v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
30
ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 29 objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 28 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (3) the defs' Motions for Summary Judgment (Dics, 10 , 16 ) be GRANTED; (4) judgment be GRANTED in favor of the defs; (5) this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 5/18/2020. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
REGINA RENEE FUQUA,
AIS # 179970,
Plaintiff,
v.
A. BAKER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-251-RAH
ORDER
On April 20, 2020, the Magistrate Judge recommended the Motions for
Summary Judgment (Doc. 10, 16) be granted and this case be dismissed with
prejudice. On May 8, 2020, Plaintiff Regina Renee Fuqua filed Objections (Doc.
29) to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 28). The
court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the
Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Upon this
court’s review and consideration of the arguments set forth in the Objections, the
Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and analysis.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Objections (Doc. 29) are OVERRULED.
2.
The Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED.
3.
The Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 10, 16) be
GRANTED.
4.
Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
5.
This case be DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE, this 18th day of May, 2020.
/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.
R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?